Darkstar Communication Blizzforums v3.5  
Portal


Old 01-22-2009
#1
 
United States Gradius
For Vengenace
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gundam Base
Posts: 5,364
Gradius doesn't suck


Gradius's Avatar
Default Mechanic 8

Mechanic Summary:
Quote
SCV: Seismic Cannon

An upgraded SCV uses this ability to hammer a mineral patch. Must be in direct contact with mineral patch. Casting time 20 sec. All other SCVs carry 6 min per trip from hammered mineral patch.

An SCV can also use the seismic cannon as a melee spell. This stuns enemies for 1 sec.

Queen: Acidic Venom

Ranged ability that can be cast on minerals. Affected minerals have 2x gathering rate for drones. One queen can cast on multiple mineral fields provided she has enough energy.

Can also be cast on enemies. Acts as damage over time spell.

Nexus: Inter-Dimensional Acceleration

A nexus can cast this ability anywhere in pylon fields (warp prism too). Causes units to move at +50% speed. Can be cast on probes for faster mining or gas.

Can also be cast on units fighting in pylon fields for enhanced micro tactics.

Expanded Description:
Quote
All abilities are tier 2 upgrades.

SCV, Queen and Nexus would all have energy bars for using these abilities. As always all numbers subject to balance.

Tailored so that macro enhancement is best option when fighting away from your base and micro enhancement is best when defending your base.

Fosters decision making situations. Do I spend my queens energy on mutant larva, venom or some other spell? Do I make more scvs or wait till the ones I have recharge their energy? Do I use my nexus ability to speed up probes or my warp prism for this colossus drop? Do I use my nexus AoE ability to get 4-6 min probes or the 2 gas probes?

Multi-tasking is between micro, this mechanic and other macro mechanics (warp-in, mutant larva, etc.) Tasks are different for each race with zerg casting ranged abilities on mineral patches, protoss casting AoE and terran "attacking" minerals with SCVs that must be rotated out after their energy is used up.

Last edited by Gradius; 01-22-2009 at 12:35 PM.


sigline
Gradius is offline
pm.gif Send a message via AIM to Gradius Send a message via MSN to Gradius

Old 01-22-2009
#2
 
United States Blazur
Your thoughts betray you
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 675
Blazur doesn't suck


Blazur's Avatar
Default

Oh this idea is hot! I like how each race has a specialized and unique means of increasing resource production. It also gives people something to do in between battles when they're just sitting in their base waiting for buildings to finish or units to train.


sigline
Blazur is offline
pm.gif

Old 01-22-2009
#3
 
Canada DemolitionSquid
TestosterOWNAGE
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 10,265
DemolitionSquid has much to be proud ofDemolitionSquid has much to be proud ofDemolitionSquid has much to be proud ofDemolitionSquid has much to be proud of


DemolitionSquid's Avatar
Default

I agree, I like this idea. However I wonder about the usefulness or possible OP of every SCV having a stunning ability.


sigline
DemolitionSquid is offline
pm.gif Send a message via MSN to DemolitionSquid

Old 01-22-2009
#4
 
United States Blazur
Your thoughts betray you
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 675
Blazur doesn't suck


Blazur's Avatar
Default

Quote
Originally Posted by DemolitionSquid View Post
I agree, I like this idea. However I wonder about the usefulness or possible OP of every SCV having a stunning ability.
That's true, and I share your concern.

Having race-specific ways of temporarily augmenting resource acquisition is nice, but it shouldn't double as damage buffers.


sigline
Blazur is offline
pm.gif

Old 01-22-2009
#5
 
United States Baneling
Green Death
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Utah
Posts: 83
Baneling doesn't suck


Baneling's Avatar
Default

I like that the abilities have duel use. It encourages macro at the base in regards to resource gathering, but can be used in combat as well.... just has a good feel to it... making it seem not so forced.

Also different methods for different races is very starcraft
Baneling is offline
pm.gif

Old 01-22-2009
#6
 
Denmark Lobais
BF Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1
Lobais doesn't suck


Default

I like this a lot.
The stunning could also give a small damage to friendly units. This way it would be even harder to macro remotely.

Last edited by Lobais; 01-22-2009 at 05:04 PM. Reason: Improved post.
Lobais is offline
pm.gif

Old 01-22-2009
#7
 
Canada SebiAlex
In Search of Answers
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 134
SebiAlex doesn't suck


SebiAlex's Avatar
Default

Interesting idea. Given your stats and some assumptions (based on the battle report video) here is a rough layout of how this will work.

Typical mineral field: 8 patches
Regular gathering time: 4 seconds (approx)
Regular drop-off return duration: 3 seconds (approx)
Regular minerals per trip: 5

General formula: (# of workers/patch) x (# of patches) x (minerals/trip) / (full cycle = gathering time + [drop-off + return] duration) = workers*minerals/s

Terran: +1 minerals per trip
(1 SCV/patch) x (8 patches) x (6 minerals)/(4 s gathering + 3 s trip) = 48/7
8 SCVs deliver 6.86 minerals/s.

Zerg: regular gathering time is halved (2s gather time)
(1 drone/patch) x (8 patches) x (5 minerals)/(2 s gathering + 3 s trip) = 40/5
8 Drones deliver 8.00 minerals/s.

Protoss: 50% speed increase = trip takes 33% less time = 2 s
(1 probe/patch) x (8 patches) x (5 minerals)/(4 s gathering + 2 s trip) = 40/6
8 Probes deliver 6.67 minerals/s.

The trip duration matters on the placement of the Nexus/CC/Hatchery. The Protoss will have the advantage if a base cannot be placed as close to a mineral field as normal (expansions only). As you can see the Zerg would have a huge advantage if mineral patches could be constantly buffed. If you limit the number of patches affected at one time, the Protoss gain the advantage since their ability is the only one not being cast on the mineral patches (you could limit the number of probes affected).

I don't really agree with the nexus increasing the speed of all Protoss units (too similar to creep).

The equation would need some adjustments if the # of patches affected (for Terran and Zerg), or Probes (Protoss) are limited. It would have to be a combination of buffed and unbuffed gathering.

Last edited by SebiAlex; 01-22-2009 at 08:20 PM.


sigline


Individual science fiction stories may seem as trivial as ever to the blinder critics and philosophers of today - but the core of science fiction, its essence has become crucial to our salvation if we are to be saved at all. - Isaac Asimov
SebiAlex is offline
pm.gif

Old 01-22-2009
#8
 
Canada Newbie1234
BF Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 48
Newbie1234 doesn't suck


Newbie1234's Avatar
Default

Though creative, I think the combination of the ideas feel more like something that would go in a mod or custom map, rather than the real game.
Newbie1234 is offline
pm.gif

Old 01-23-2009
#9
 
Poland MaybenextTime
BF Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 127
MaybenextTime doesn't suck


Default

I think it should be gathering rate increase for Protoss if anything.

Movement speed increase would result in this mechanic becoming useless after you reach saturation point since faster speed = saturation point reached with lower than normally worker count = need to move redudant workers somewhere.

On the other hand, increased gathering rate = saturation point reached with higher than normally worker count = you always get some kind of a bonus and you can oversaturate your line if you want to to reach the new saturation point.
MaybenextTime is offline
pm.gif

Old 01-23-2009
#10
 
United States mr. peasant
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,649
mr. peasant doesn't suck


Default

I will agree that having race-specific solutions to the 'lack of macro' problem is certainly fun and interesting. However, one must remember that doing so may introduce racial imbalances which would require careful rebalancing; particularly since they have secondary, combat functions which would thus may synergize too well with other abilities. In other words, by solving the macro issue using this method, are we simply swapping one problem for another?
mr. peasant is offline
pm.gif

Old 01-23-2009
#11
 
No country specified. To select a country, go to User CP -> Edit Profile -> Country Justamonsta
BF Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 38
Justamonsta doesn't suck


Default

Those mechanics are close interpretation of my mechanics, which unfortunately for SC2 aren’t mentioned here.

As for other represented mechanics: why they are solely concern Gas mining and Gas mechanics? Have you gotten stuck or what?

Gradius and SCLegacy team, have you forgotten the fundamentals? SC2 do NOT need a ‘solid mechanics’. On the contrary, it needs mechanics which are simple, but complex; creative, but intuitive; modern, but StarCraft.
And what I see here – a bunch of complicated, unintuitive, partially plagiarized and non StarCraft ideas, which were chosen by YOU.

Were you in a hurry? Or what? Semi-finalist ideas are 10 TIMES BETTER then that! Even this idea: it’s close but not even near to be Finalist.

As a result I’m not going to vote.

It was a mistake to anchor my hopes on you…
Justamonsta is offline
pm.gif

Old 01-23-2009
#12
 
United States Nicol Bolas
BF Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,683
Nicol Bolas doesn't suck


Default

I'm sorry, but that's BS.

I read through the semi-finalists, and they deserve to be semi-finalists. The only finalist entry that doesn't deserve to be here is #1 (it's also the one least likely to be used by Blizzard); the rest (compared to the competition) are far better thought out than the semi's.


sigline
"When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up." - C. S. Lewis
Nicol Bolas is offline
pm.gif

Old 01-23-2009
#13
 
United Kingdom ChaosSmurf
Kerrigan's Appointed Pony
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,077
ChaosSmurf doesn't suck


ChaosSmurf's Avatar
Default

Quote
Originally Posted by Nicol Bolas View Post
I'm sorry, but that's BS.

I read through the semi-finalists, and they deserve to be semi-finalists. The only finalist entry that doesn't deserve to be here is #1 (it's also the one least likely to be used by Blizzard); the rest (compared to the competition) are far better thought out than the semi's.
I agree other than one Semi-finalist that I was a big fan of (that's why it's there). It's the one about yellow minerals inside of blue ones, that particular part I liked a lot.


sigline
There appears to be a smurf in your forum.
ChaosSmurf is offline
pm.gif

Old 01-23-2009
#14
 
United States Archerofaiur
BF Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 482
Archerofaiur doesn't suck


Default

Quote
Originally Posted by ChaosSmurf View Post
I agree other than one Semi-finalist that I was a big fan of (that's why it's there). It's the one about yellow minerals inside of blue ones, that particular part I liked a lot.

That one was mine too : )



By the way guys, feel free to offer your version of the above mechanic. So if you think the scv's would be too powerful with a stun ability then offer something else like maybe a drilling attack or whatever you can think of. I would really like to hear about how you would construct race specific macro mechanics. Have fun!

Last edited by Archerofaiur; 01-23-2009 at 04:06 PM.


sigline
"Blizzard will never add race specific macro mechanics no matter how many long winded essays you write."
-A Woefully Mistaken BNet Troll




Georgetown University School of Medicine '13
Archerofaiur is offline
pm.gif

Old 01-24-2009
#15
 
United States mutantmagnet
BF Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 101
mutantmagnet doesn't suck


Default

I like the Terran variation. I don't like the Protoss variation because it would be the same as creep for Zerg only this time the peons also get a boost. I like the Zerg but I have a different idea on that.

Allow the drones to have morphing upgrade into another creature that gains resources every time it damages enemy units. Obviously this should be a tech 3 upgrade while the Terran is tech 2.
I'm not sure what to do about probes.
mutantmagnet is offline
pm.gif
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:28 PM.
vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
BlizzForums is hosted by DarkStar Communications, home to high quality Ventrilo Servers.
Contact Us - BlizzForums - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top