Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 27

Thread: Citifield.... really....?

  1. #1
    Voting independent
    Array

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    4,889

    Default Citifield.... really....?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citi_Field

    I heard about it on the news today, dont care to try and find a news link for it. But, anyway... apparently citibank (the same bank that received 45billion from the bank bailout) is paying $400 MILLION just to have the field called citi field. Is this seriously how our hard earned money is going to be spent? Naming themself for a baseball field? I am righteously pissed at how poorly handled this entire thing is right now. The people that are at the top of these banks that got bailed out need to be fired and replaced, then we need to get things properly managed and have all of the spending publically available. This is flat out bullshit.
    sigline

  2. #2

  3. #3
    Forum Elder
    Array

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    15,473

    Default

    There are far more egregious expenditures that warrant our attention. While this is a large chunk of change and it "seems" wasteful, it is quite typical in the advertising world. The idea here is that more than $400b will be returned to them in enhanced business due to their name being used in a variety of media and news coverage, not to mention direct imprinting on stadium merchandise.

  4. #4
    Forum Elder
    Array

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    5,586

    Default

    they're such an awful bank.
    i went to their head office branch and went "so, i want to open an account" and they looked at me like i was out of my mind.

  5. #5
    TestosterOWNAGE
    Array

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    10,221

    Default

    You know, every time I mention the inherent greed of man, and its integral part in this recession with outsourcing, bad lending, misuse of the bailout money, and the Bush administration's quest for oil coverup, some of the members of this forum who many consider "highly intelligent" (like Ben) laugh at me, stating that greed is too vague an idea to be so responsible for this mess.

    Where is your God now?
    sigline

  6. #6
    Nixon in '72!
    Array

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Annapolis, Maryland
    Posts
    13,457

    Default

    Nobody has ever asserted that, we have just pointed out that your argument that the recession was caused by capitalism is 100% retarded. Stop pontificating on subjects about which you know nothing, please. That is, any subject at all.
    sigline
    Why change Dicks in the middle of a screw? Vote Nixon in '72!

  7. #7
    TestosterOWNAGE
    Array

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    10,221

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ben View Post
    Nobody has ever asserted that, we have just pointed out that your argument that the recession was caused by capitalism is 100% retarded. Stop pontificating on subjects about which you know nothing, please. That is, any subject.
    It was most assuredly caused by badly regulated capitalism. Capitalism makes being greedy so much easier.
    sigline

  8. #8
    Nixon in '72!
    Array

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Annapolis, Maryland
    Posts
    13,457

    Default

    No, it was caused by central banking. Go read a book you know-nothing.
    sigline
    Why change Dicks in the middle of a screw? Vote Nixon in '72!

  9. #9
    TestosterOWNAGE
    Array

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    10,221

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ben View Post
    No, it was caused by central banking. Go read a book you know-nothing.
    Central banking that was allowed to occur via badly regulated (or in the case of the Bush Admin, unregulated and abused) central banking.

    Along with the list of other things I mentioned. Multiple factors, all based in man's inherent greed.
    sigline

  10. #10
    Nixon in '72!
    Array

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Annapolis, Maryland
    Posts
    13,457

    Default

    Your views contradict each other. Central banking is direct government intervention in the economy, via a monopolization of the money supply in order to manipulate interest rates to "optimal" levels. You are asserting that the recession was the fault of capitalism, but it was caused by government's attempt to control the economy.
    sigline
    Why change Dicks in the middle of a screw? Vote Nixon in '72!

  11. #11
    TestosterOWNAGE
    Array

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    10,221

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ben View Post
    Your views contradict each other. Central banking is direct government intervention in the economy, via a monopolization of the money supply in order to manipulate interest rates to "optimal" levels. You are asserting that the recession was the fault of capitalism, but it was caused by government's attempt to control the economy.
    Capitalism on its own, with the inherent greed of the consumer and the American will to consume, brought you here.
    Central Banking, the Government's attempt to regulate via monopolization of the money supply in order to manipulate interest rates to "optimal" levels, only served to increase the damage because it was badly handled and ultimately failed.

    The two are intertwined. If the government had done its job and simply regulated instead of manipulated, you would be in much better shape.
    sigline

  12. #12
    Nixon in '72!
    Array

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Annapolis, Maryland
    Posts
    13,457

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DemolitionSquid View Post
    Capitalism on its own, with the inherent greed of the consumer and the American will to consume, brought you here.
    Central Banking, the Government's attempt to regulate via monopolization of the money supply in order to manipulate interest rates to "optimal" levels, only served to increase the damage because it was badly handled and ultimately failed.

    The two are intertwined. If the government had done its job and simply regulated instead of manipulated, you would be in much better shape.
    no.
    sigline
    Why change Dicks in the middle of a screw? Vote Nixon in '72!

  13. #13
    TestosterOWNAGE
    Array

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    10,221

    Default

    There's a reason its just a theory Ben.
    It's never been proven.
    And a recession of this magnitude as never happened before.
    I stand by my own theory.
    sigline

  14. #14
    Nixon in '72!
    Array

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Annapolis, Maryland
    Posts
    13,457

    Default

    ATBC is a theory like evolution is a theory.
    sigline
    Why change Dicks in the middle of a screw? Vote Nixon in '72!

  15. #15
    TestosterOWNAGE
    Array

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    10,221

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ben View Post
    ATBC is a theory like evolution is a theory.
    And I'm still willing to accept there might be a God, if I was ever handed any solid proof.
    Evolution just has more, like fossils, and the recorded history of the evolution of the dog.
    sigline

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •